of Lundy Bancroft
"You can not make a finding completely neutral when it comes to a violent man and a woman victim. Dr. Judith Herman explains very eloquently in his masterpiece" Trauma and admission "to the" neutrality "in fact advances the interests of the aggressor much of the interest of the victim and can not therefore be regarded as a neutral thing. Since the attacker prefers to have you completely on his side, prefects will be satisfied your decision to take a middle ground. For him, this means that you consider the problem of torque partly the fault of women, and part his fault, then is not more violence.
In reality, remain "neutral" means colluding with the attackers, whether intentionally or not. If you are aware of a chronic or severe mistreatment and do not act, your silence shall you do not see anything unacceptable. Attackers interpret the silence as an endorsement, or some type of forgiveness. For the female victim in the meantime, the silence means that no one wants to help - exactly what the attackers want. Anyone who decides to turn a blind eye then becomes the ally of the attacker ... And if you see or hear violence or threats, that means you have to call the police "
Lundy Bancroft , from the book: " But why? (In the minds of angry and controlling men) ."
http://pma-madri.blogspot.com/2010/02/il-mito-della-neutralita.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment